Every AI Model on RandomSeed: Compared by Medium
A complete breakdown of every model available on RandomSeed — image, video, voice, music, enhancement, and 3D — with side-by-side comparisons of quality, speed, cost, and best use cases.
RandomSeed offers models across six mediums: image generation, video, voice, music, image enhancement, and 3D. This guide covers every model available — what it does well, where it falls short, and how it compares to the alternatives in its category.
All models are available on a pay-per-generation basis in RandomSeed. No subscriptions, no tier restrictions.
Image Generation
Image generation is the largest and most varied category. Models range from open-source workhorses to commercial flagships, each with distinct aesthetic tendencies and technical strengths.
| Model | Provider | Credits | Speed | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HiDream Fast | 3 cr | ~5s | Cheapest model, fast iteration, 17B sparse MoE architecture | Lower fidelity than commercial models, limited prompt adherence | |
| FLUX Dev | Black Forest Labs | 6 cr | ~8s | Open-source, LoRA support, strong quality-to-cost ratio | Not as sharp as FLUX Pro on complex prompts |
| Nano Banana | 5 cr | ~5s | Budget-friendly, good for iteration, consistent output | Less detail than Pro-tier models | |
| Nano Banana Pro | 8 cr | ~5s | Character consistency, up to 4K resolution, fast | Aesthetic skews stylized rather than photorealistic | |
| Grok Imagine | xAI | 5 cr | ~8s | Distinctive aesthetic, artistic flair, image-to-image support | Less predictable than FLUX for precision work |
| FLUX Pro 1.1 | Black Forest Labs | 10 cr | ~8s | Excellent photorealism, LoRA support, strong prompt adherence | Higher cost than Dev; slower than budget options |
| Recraft V3 | Recraft | 10 cr | ~10s | Design assets, long-text rendering, vector art, brand imagery | Less versatile for photorealism |
| Recraft V4 | Recraft | 10 cr | ~12s | Improved design output over V3, strong for UI/product mockups | Slower than V3 with modest gains for non-design use |
| GPT Image 1 | OpenAI | 8 cr | ~12s | Strong instruction following, integrates with OpenAI ecosystem | Less photorealistic than FLUX Pro at similar cost |
| FLUX 2 Pro | Black Forest Labs | 12 cr | ~5–8s | All-rounder, studio-grade quality, typography, LoRA support | Higher cost; overkill for casual generation |
| FLUX Kontext | Black Forest Labs | 12 cr | ~10s | Subject-reference conditioning, consistent characters/objects | Requires reference image; not a pure text-to-image tool |
| Ideogram v3 | Ideogram | 15 cr | ~15s | Best-in-class text-in-image, logos, typography, style reference | Slower and pricier; aesthetic is more graphic than photographic |
| FLUX Pro Ultra | Black Forest Labs | 15 cr | ~15s | Up to 4MP resolution, maximum fidelity, print-ready | Slowest and most expensive in the image category |
| FLUX Kontext Max | Black Forest Labs | 20 cr | ~15s | Enhanced subject conditioning with higher fidelity than Kontext | Premium cost; only worthwhile with strong reference images |
| Recraft V4 Pro | Recraft | 20 cr | ~12s | Premium design assets, highest quality in the Recraft lineup | Most expensive image model; specialized for design work |
Image Model Quick Take
- Best for photorealism: FLUX Pro Ultra, FLUX 2 Pro
- Best for design and typography: Ideogram v3, Recraft V4 Pro
- Best value: FLUX Dev, HiDream Fast
- Best for character consistency: FLUX Kontext, Nano Banana Pro
- Most artistic: Grok Imagine
Video Generation
All video models on RandomSeed take an image as input and animate it. The key tradeoffs are realism vs. motion creativity, generation speed, and whether the model produces audio alongside the video.
| Model | Provider | Credits | Speed | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTX Video | Eleuther AI | 10 cr | ~20s | Cheapest video model, open-source, fast previews | Lower motion quality; not suitable for final output |
| Luma Ray 2 Flash | Luma AI | 50 cr | ~1 min | Fastest quality video, physically plausible motion | Less cinematic than Veo or Kling at this price |
| Wan 2.6 | Alibaba | 55 cr | ~1.5 min | Multi-scene narratives, longer clips (5–15s), good motion | Less precise camera control than Kling or Veo 2 |
| Kling 1.6 Standard | Kuaishou | 55 cr | ~2 min | 720p, good for iteration, reliable motion at lower cost | Lower resolution than Pro; less refined than newer models |
| Hailuo 02 | MiniMax | 60 cr | ~2 min | Strong character motion, 768p @ 25fps, natural movement | Less cinematic control than Veo 2 |
| Seedance 1.5 Pro | ByteDance | 60 cr | ~2 min | Character animation, fluid body motion, good at 8–12s clips | Narrower use case; less versatile for general video |
| Veo 3 Fast | Google DeepMind | 70 cr | ~1.5 min | Cinematic quality with natural audio, faster Veo 3 variant | Audio quality lower than full Veo 3; less control than Kling |
| Sora 2 Pro | OpenAI | 80 cr | ~2 min | Premium video generation, strong physics, up to 12s clips | Expensive; slower than Luma or Wan at similar quality |
| Veo 2 | Google DeepMind | 80 cr | ~2 min | Physics simulation, precise camera control, 1080p | No audio; requires strong reference image for best results |
| Kling 1.6 Pro | Kuaishou | 100 cr | ~3 min | 1080p, 10s clips, production-quality motion | Slowest in the Kling lineup; high credit cost |
| Kling 2.1 Pro | Kuaishou | 110 cr | ~3 min | Motion brushes, multi-image input, best motion control available | Most expensive Kling model; slowest to generate |
| Veo 3 | Google DeepMind | 120 cr | ~2.5 min | Cinematic output with synchronized natural audio, up to 8s @ 1080p | Most expensive video model; audio varies in quality |
Video Model Quick Take
- Best cinematic quality: Veo 3, Veo 2
- Best motion control: Kling 2.1 Pro
- Best for characters: Seedance 1.5 Pro, Hailuo 02
- Best speed/quality balance: Luma Ray 2 Flash
- Best budget option: LTX Video (previews), Wan 2.6 (quality)
- Only models with audio: Veo 3, Veo 3 Fast
Voice / Text-to-Speech
TTS models vary most significantly in latency, language support, and whether they can clone or customize voices. All five models are available in the RandomSeed audio generation panel.
| Model | Provider | Credits | Speed | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kokoro EN | 5 cr | <1s | #1 on HuggingFace TTS Arena, ultra-fast English narration | English only; less expressive than premium models | |
| Dia TTS | Alibaba | 5 cr | ~5s | Multi-speaker dialogue, strong emotional expression | Limited language support; not suitable for real-time |
| MiniMax Turbo | MiniMax | 8 cr | ~5s | Ultra-low latency, good for real-time and chatbot voice | Quality trades off against the HD variant |
| MiniMax HD | MiniMax | 12 cr | ~8s | #1 Speech Arena ELO, professional voiceover quality | Slower and more expensive than Turbo; not for real-time |
| ElevenLabs Turbo | ElevenLabs | 12 cr | ~6s | 32 languages, voice cloning, industry-standard quality | Highest cost; voice cloning requires sample audio |
TTS Model Quick Take
- Fastest: Kokoro EN (under 1 second)
- Best quality: MiniMax HD
- Best for multilingual: ElevenLabs Turbo (32 languages)
- Best for dialogue/drama: Dia TTS
- Best for real-time: MiniMax Turbo
Music Generation
RandomSeed offers two music generation models with different tradeoffs between cost, generation time, and output quality.
| Model | Provider | Credits | Speed | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CassetteAI | CassetteAI | 8 cr | ~10s | Fast music generation, low cost, good for quick background tracks | Less compositional depth than MiniMax Music |
| MiniMax Music 2.0 | MiniMax | 20 cr | ~60s | Premium output quality, richer arrangements, more musical structure | 2.5x the cost, slower; overkill for background music |
Music Model Quick Take
- Best for quick drafts and backgrounds: CassetteAI
- Best for polished, final-quality music: MiniMax Music 2.0
Image Enhancement
Enhancement models process existing images rather than generating from scratch. They cover background removal, upscaling, and face restoration — typically used as the final step in a generation workflow.
| Model | Provider | Credits | Speed | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Face Restore | CodeFormer | 1 cr | <1s | Cheapest model overall, excellent for degraded/blurry faces | Only works on faces; no general image enhancement |
| Super Resolution | FAL | 2 cr | ~6s | Pixel-accurate 4x upscale, preserves original detail faithfully | Doesn't add new detail like generative upscalers |
| BG Remove (Bria) | Bria | 5 cr | ~4s | Commercial-grade cutouts, clean edges, good for product photography | Struggles with complex hair/fur edges vs. BEN |
| BG Remove (BEN) | Open Source | 6 cr | ~4s | Handles hair and fur edges, supports 4K, also works on video | Slightly slower and pricier than Bria for standard subjects |
| Topaz Upscale | Topaz | 10 cr | ~15s | Professional 4x upscale, multiple modes, industry-standard quality | No hallucinated detail; faithful to input (vs. Creative Upscale) |
| Creative Upscale | FAL | 12 cr | ~15s | Generative upscale adds new detail, good for AI-generated images | Can alter original content; not suitable for photos needing accuracy |
Enhancement Model Quick Take
- Background removal (clean edges): Bria
- Background removal (hair/fur): BEN
- Faithful upscale: Topaz, Super Resolution
- Generative upscale (more detail): Creative Upscale
- Face repair: Face Restore
3D Generation
3D models take a single image and produce a mesh — exportable as GLB or OBJ for use in game engines, 3D software, or web viewers. Speed and mesh quality vary significantly across the four models.
| Model | Provider | Credits | Speed | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trellis | Microsoft | 5 cr | ~25s | Fastest and cheapest 3D model, good for quick previews | Lower mesh quality than production models |
| Hunyuan3D Turbo | Tencent | 20 cr | ~30s | Near-instant generation, solid quality for quick iteration | Less detail than Hunyuan3D Full at 2x the cost of Trellis |
| Meshy 6 | Meshy | 30 cr | ~45s | Realistic geometry, clean topology, production-ready meshes | Higher cost; slower than Trellis for draft work |
| Hunyuan3D Full | Tencent | 40 cr | ~60s | Most detailed 3D output, superior surface quality, production-grade | Most expensive and slowest 3D model |
3D Model Quick Take
- Best for previews: Trellis
- Best speed/quality balance: Hunyuan3D Turbo
- Best final output: Hunyuan3D Full, Meshy 6
Cross-Medium Credit Summary
To put the cost ranges in perspective across all six mediums:
| Medium | Cheapest | Mid-Range | Premium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Image | HiDream Fast (3 cr) | FLUX Pro 1.1 (10 cr) | Recraft V4 Pro (20 cr) |
| Video | LTX Video (10 cr) | Hailuo 02 (60 cr) | Veo 3 (120 cr) |
| Voice | Kokoro EN (5 cr) | MiniMax Turbo (8 cr) | ElevenLabs Turbo (12 cr) |
| Music | CassetteAI (8 cr) | — | MiniMax Music 2.0 (20 cr) |
| Enhancement | Face Restore (1 cr) | BG Remove (5–6 cr) | Creative Upscale (12 cr) |
| 3D | Trellis (5 cr) | Hunyuan3D Turbo (20 cr) | Hunyuan3D Full (40 cr) |
Choosing the Right Model
The right model depends on where you are in your workflow:
- Early exploration: Use the cheapest fast models (HiDream Fast, LTX Video, Trellis) to validate direction before committing to higher-cost generations.
- Iteration: Mid-range models (FLUX Dev, Luma Ray 2 Flash, MiniMax Turbo) give you meaningful quality feedback without burning through credits.
- Final output: Premium models (FLUX Pro Ultra, Veo 3, MiniMax HD, Hunyuan3D Full) for the deliverable — after direction is locked.
Browse the full model list and start generating on the models page, or jump directly into the studio.
Try These Models in RandomSeed
All models listed here are available in RandomSeed with pay-per-generation pricing. Start with 100 free credits — enough to explore several models across multiple mediums before spending anything.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which image model has the best quality?
For photorealism and prompt adherence, FLUX Pro Ultra and FLUX 2 Pro lead the pack. For design assets and typography, Ideogram v3 and Recraft V4 Pro are the strongest choices. Quality depends heavily on use case.
Which video model is best for beginners?
Luma Ray 2 Flash is a great starting point — it's the fastest (around 1 minute) and most affordable video model at 50 credits. LTX Video is even cheaper at 10 credits if you just need a quick preview.
What's the cheapest way to generate images?
HiDream Fast at 3 credits (~$0.01) is the most affordable image model. For a step up in quality without spending much more, FLUX Dev at 6 credits is excellent value.
Which TTS model supports multiple languages?
ElevenLabs Turbo supports 32 languages and includes voice cloning. MiniMax HD is ranked #1 on the Speech Arena ELO leaderboard and also supports multiple languages with professional voiceover quality.
How do the 3D models differ?
Trellis is the fastest and cheapest entry point (5 credits, ~25s). Meshy 6 and Hunyuan3D Full produce the highest quality production meshes, with Hunyuan3D Full being the most detailed. Hunyuan3D Turbo is a good balance of speed and quality.